Here is the Priority scheme being used for the VTT, and it was suggested that we 
use as an intial cut for all APT development.  One item of note as regards these 
priorities vs. schemes we have used in the past is that this is a dynamic 
prioritization scheme.  OPRs will be reprioritized once a decision is made to 
work on those OPRs.

50	Plan to complete for the next major release
60	Would like to complete for the next major release
100	Bugs in existing features
200	Enhancement seen as High priority
280	Enhancement seen as Medium priority
300	Enhancement seen as Low priority

This implies that there is at least some planning for each release and some 
replanning following a release to determine what to do with the OPRs that are 
left as regards the next release.

OPRs will be prioritized at the end of the APT project Meeting.